MAGELLAN LONGEVITY
HomeResearchStudy library › NT-proBNP and mortality across the spectrum of glucose tolerance in…
Study summary · Cardiovascular & vascular aging

Can N-terminal pro-B natriuretic peptide (NT-ProBNP) levels identify individuals at higher cardiovascular risk, independent of their blood glucose levels?

In one paragraph

NT-proBNP Cardiac Test, a survey study in 5502 participants (Cardiovasc Diabetol 2022, PMID 36344968) — after a median follow-up of 13 years, 1509 participants died, with 330 deaths due to cardiovascular causes. The study design does not evaluate whether intensification of treatment based on biomarker data might lead to improvements in cardiovascular risk reduction.

Source: Cardiovasc Diabetol 2022, PMID 36344968 ↗ · Research map · How Magellan grades evidence · evidence confidence: high

Cardiovasc Diabetol · 2022 · PMID 36344968 · DOI 10.1186/s12933-022-01671-w

Plain-English summary written and published by Magellan Longevity · medical review by Gabriel Radu, DO (physiatrist, NPI 1376861765). We summarize what the paper reported — we did not run this study.

The takeaway

Higher NT-ProBNP levels are independently linked to increased risk of death from any cause and cardiovascular disease, regardless of blood sugar levels.

The question

Can N-terminal pro-B natriuretic peptide (NT-ProBNP) levels identify individuals at higher cardiovascular risk, independent of their blood glucose levels?

What they tested

The study aims to evaluate if NT-ProBNP can help identify subjects at higher cardiovascular risk, independently of blood glucose levels.

How they did it

Serum NT-ProBNP levels were measured in 5502 participants aged 45-79 years without heart failure from the 1999-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Participants included 3380 with normoglycemia, 1125 with pre-diabetes, and 997 with diabetes. Cox and Fine Gray models, adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors, were used to assess the association between NT-ProBNP levels and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality through December 2015.

What they found

After a median follow-up of 13 years, 1509 participants died, with 330 deaths due to cardiovascular causes. Compared to participants with NT-ProBNP < 100 pg/ml, those with levels 100-300 pg/ml had a higher incidence of all-cause mortality (HR 1.61) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.57). Participants with NT-ProBNP levels ">=" 300 pg/ml had an even higher incidence of all-cause mortality (HR 2.96) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 2.08). This association remained consistent across subgroups based on glycemic status, obesity, age, and sex.

Risk of Mortality by NT-ProBNP Levels
Values shown: Hazard Ratio
All-cause mortality (100-300 pg/ml)1.61
All-cause mortality (">=" 300 pg/ml)2.96
Cardiovascular mortality (100-300 pg/ml)1.57
Cardiovascular mortality (">=" 300 pg/ml)2.08

Hazard Ratios for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality compared to participants with NT-ProBNP < 100 pg/ml.

What it means

Elevated NT-ProBNP is independently associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the general population and may help identify patients at the highest risk.

Limitations

The study design does not evaluate whether intensification of treatment based on biomarker data might lead to improvements in cardiovascular risk reduction.

“Elevated NT-proBNP is independently associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality”— from the published abstract, Cardiovasc Diabetol 2022

The paper at a glance

TitleNT-proBNP and mortality across the spectrum of glucose tolerance in the general US population
JournalCardiovasc Diabetol
Year2022
PMID36344968 ↗
DOI10.1186/s12933-022-01671-w ↗
TopicCardiovascular & vascular aging

Read the source: PubMed record (authors, abstract, full citation) ↗ · Publisher via doi.org ↗

Where Magellan uses this paper

This citation sits behind the evidence grade on the pages below. Grades are set from the research and are independent of affiliate commissions.

NT-proBNP Cardiac Test

Improves cardiovascular risk estimation. Research relevant to this mechanism is indexed on PubMed and linked below; it describes the mechanism rather than this specific product.

Molecules & mechanisms in this paper

Each of these is named in the paper’s own words above. Open the monograph for the full mechanism and its other citations.

Cite this page

These citations point at this summary. To cite the original paper with its full author list, use the PubMed record or doi.org.

APA
Magellan Longevity. (2026). Can N-terminal pro-B natriuretic peptide (NT-ProBNP) levels identify individuals at higher cardiovascular risk, independent of their blood glucose levels? [Plain-English summary of Cardiovasc Diabetol 2022, PMID 36344968, DOI 10.1186/s12933-022-01671-w]. Magellan Longevity. https://magellanlongevity.com/study/d36344968.html
BibTeX
@misc{magellan_d36344968, title = {Can N-terminal pro-B natriuretic peptide (NT-ProBNP) levels identify individuals at higher cardiovascular risk, independent of their blood glucose levels?}, author = {{Magellan Longevity}}, year = {2026}, howpublished = {\url{https://magellanlongevity.com/study/d36344968.html}}, note = {Plain-English summary of PubMed PMID 36344968; DOI 10.1186/s12933-022-01671-w; Cardiovasc Diabetol 2022. Reviewed by Gabriel Radu, DO}, urldate = {2026-08-11} }
Permalink
https://magellanlongevity.com/study/d36344968.html

Related studies in the Magellan library

All 67 Magellan summaries on cardiovascular & vascular aging →

How this summary was made. Every section above restates what the published abstract of PMID 36344968 reports — the question, the design, the numbers, the authors’ own conclusion and their stated limitations. We do not add claims the paper did not make, and we keep negative and no-effect findings in. Magellan’s evidence grades are set from research like this and never from affiliate commissions.

Prefer the interactive version? Open this summary in the Magellan app → · Browse all 314 study summaries →

Educational information, not medical advice. This is a plain-English summary of published research; it is not a treatment recommendation and nothing here is intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Individual studies can be wrong, and a single paper rarely settles a question. Talk to your physician before acting on any research, especially if you are pregnant, nursing, or taking medication.