MAGELLAN LONGEVITY
HomeResearchStudy library › Effect of Repeated Low-Level Red-Light Therapy for Myopia Control in…
Study summary · Sleep, circadian rhythm & stress

Does repeated low-level red-light (RLRL) therapy effectively and safely control myopia progression in children?

In one paragraph

Repeated Low-Level Red-Light Therapy, a randomized controlled trial in 264 children (Ophthalmology 2022, PMID 34863776) — among 246 children analyzed, the 12-month axial elongation was 0.13 mm for the RLRL group and 0.38 mm for the SVS group. Scope: 264 children, over 12 months, and the abstract states no limitations.

Source: Ophthalmology 2022, PMID 34863776 ↗ · Research map · How Magellan grades evidence · evidence confidence: medium

Ophthalmology · 2022 · PMID 34863776 · DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.11.023

Plain-English summary written and published by Magellan Longevity · medical review by Gabriel Radu, DO (physiatrist, NPI 1376861765). We summarize what the paper reported — we did not run this study.

The takeaway

Repeated low-level red-light therapy significantly slows myopia progression in children with no observed adverse effects.

The question

Does repeated low-level red-light (RLRL) therapy effectively and safely control myopia progression in children?

What they tested

The study implicitly hypothesized that RLRL therapy would be more effective than single-vision spectacles (SVS) alone in controlling myopia progression in children, as measured by changes in axial length and spherical equivalent refraction (SER), without significant adverse events.

How they did it

This was a multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, single-blind clinical trial involving 264 children aged 8 to 13 with myopia. Participants were randomized to either the intervention group (RLRL treatment plus SVS) or the control group (SVS only). RLRL therapy involved a desktop device emitting 650-nm red light for 3 minutes per session, twice daily, 5 days per week, administered at home. Primary outcomes were changes in axial length and SER measured over 12 months.

What they found

Among 246 children analyzed, the 12-month axial elongation was 0.13 mm for the RLRL group and 0.38 mm for the SVS group. SER progression was -0.20 D for the RLRL group and -0.79 D for the SVS group. The differences between groups were 0.26 mm in axial elongation and -0.59 D in SER progression, favoring the RLRL group. No severe adverse events, functional visual loss, or structural damage were observed.

12-Month Myopia Progression
Values shown: Change (mm or D)
RLRL (Axial Elongation)0.13
SVS (Axial Elongation)0.38
RLRL (SER Progression)-0.2
SVS (SER Progression)-0.79

Comparison of 12-month axial elongation (mm) and spherical equivalent refraction (SER) progression (D) between repeated low-level red-light (RLRL) therapy and single-vision spectacle (SVS) groups.

What it means

Repeated low-level red-light therapy is a promising alternative treatment for myopia control in children, demonstrating good user acceptability and no documented functional or structural damage.

Limitations

The abstract does not explicitly state limitations of the study.

Where the published abstract does not list limitations, we say so rather than inventing them. Read the full paper on PubMed before drawing conclusions.

“repeated low-level red-light therapy is a promising alternative treatment for myopia control”— from the published abstract, Ophthalmology 2022

The paper at a glance

TitleEffect of Repeated Low-Level Red-Light Therapy for Myopia Control in Children: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
JournalOphthalmology
Year2022
PMID34863776 ↗
DOI10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.11.023 ↗
TopicSleep, circadian rhythm & stress

Read the source: PubMed record (authors, abstract, full citation) ↗ · Publisher via doi.org ↗

Where Magellan uses this paper

This citation sits behind the evidence grade on the pages below. Grades are set from the research and are independent of affiliate commissions.

Photobiomodulation (Red & Near-Infrared Light)

The primary target of red and near-infrared light is cytochrome c oxidase, an enzyme in the mitochondrial respiratory chain; stimulating it is associated with increased cellular energy (ATP) production and reduced inflammation.

Cite this page

These citations point at this summary. To cite the original paper with its full author list, use the PubMed record or doi.org.

APA
Magellan Longevity. (2026). Does repeated low-level red-light (RLRL) therapy effectively and safely control myopia progression in children? [Plain-English summary of Ophthalmology 2022, PMID 34863776, DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.11.023]. Magellan Longevity. https://magellanlongevity.com/study/x15.html
BibTeX
@misc{magellan_x15, title = {Does repeated low-level red-light (RLRL) therapy effectively and safely control myopia progression in children?}, author = {{Magellan Longevity}}, year = {2026}, howpublished = {\url{https://magellanlongevity.com/study/x15.html}}, note = {Plain-English summary of PubMed PMID 34863776; DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.11.023; Ophthalmology 2022. Reviewed by Gabriel Radu, DO}, urldate = {2026-08-11} }
Permalink
https://magellanlongevity.com/study/x15.html

Related studies in the Magellan library

All 23 Magellan summaries on sleep, circadian rhythm & stress →

How this summary was made. Every section above restates what the published abstract of PMID 34863776 reports — the question, the design, the numbers, the authors’ own conclusion and their stated limitations. We do not add claims the paper did not make, and we keep negative and no-effect findings in. Magellan’s evidence grades are set from research like this and never from affiliate commissions.

Prefer the interactive version? Open this summary in the Magellan app → · Browse all 314 study summaries →

Educational information, not medical advice. This is a plain-English summary of published research; it is not a treatment recommendation and nothing here is intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Individual studies can be wrong, and a single paper rarely settles a question. Talk to your physician before acting on any research, especially if you are pregnant, nursing, or taking medication.