Does low-load resistance training with blood-flow restriction (BFR-RT) produce similar increases in muscle strength and mass compared to conventional high-load resistance training (HL-RT)?
Blood Flow Restriction Cuffs, a systematic review and meta-analysis (Sports Med 2018, PMID 29043659) — however, both HL-RT and BFR-RT showed similar effects on muscle hypertrophy. No numeric effect size is reported for Blood Flow Restriction Cuffs in the source abstract.
Source: Sports Med 2018, PMID 29043659 ↗ · Research map · How Magellan grades evidence · evidence confidence: low
Sports Med · 2018 · PMID 29043659 · DOI 10.1007/s40279-017-0795-y
High-load training is better for strength gains, but both high-load and blood-flow restriction training are equally effective for muscle growth.
The question
Does low-load resistance training with blood-flow restriction (BFR-RT) produce similar increases in muscle strength and mass compared to conventional high-load resistance training (HL-RT)?
What they tested
The study aims to compare the effects of HL-RT versus BFR-RT on muscle adaptations.
How they did it
A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, identifying studies from electronic databases. Inclusion criteria included pre- and post-training assessments of muscular strength and hypertrophy, comparison of HL-RT vs. BFR-RT, a PEDro score of at least 4, and reported means and standard deviations or estimable data.
What they found
High-load resistance training (HL-RT) resulted in greater increases in muscle strength compared to blood-flow restriction resistance training (BFR-RT). However, both HL-RT and BFR-RT showed similar effects on muscle hypertrophy.
What it means
Maximum muscle strength may be optimized by HL-RT, while both HL-RT and BFR-RT appear equally effective in increasing muscle mass. BFR-RT is a valid and effective approach for increasing muscle strength across various ages and physical capacities, especially for individuals with physical limitations.
Limitations
The abstract does not explicitly state limitations of the meta-analysis itself, but rather discusses the applicability of BFR-RT for specific populations.
Where the published abstract does not list limitations, we say so rather than inventing them. Read the full paper on PubMed before drawing conclusions.
The paper at a glance
| Title | Muscle Strength and Mass Adaptations Between High-Load and Low-Load Resistance Training With Blood-Flow Restriction: a meta-analysis |
|---|---|
| Journal | Sports Med |
| Year | 2018 |
| PMID | 29043659 ↗ |
| DOI | 10.1007/s40279-017-0795-y ↗ |
| Topic | Muscle, strength & physical function |
Read the source: PubMed record (authors, abstract, full citation) ↗ · Publisher via doi.org ↗
Where Magellan uses this paper
This citation sits behind the evidence grade on the pages below. Grades are set from the research and are independent of affiliate commissions.
Blood Flow Restriction Cuffs
Meta-analyses of randomized trials show that low-load resistance training with blood flow restriction increases muscle strength and size more than the same light loads without occlusion, and produces muscle hypertrophy comparable to heavy-load training, although heavy loads still tend to yield somewhat greater gains…
Blood flow restriction (BFR) training pairs low-load exercise (typically 20-40% of one-repetition…
Research describes the compound or intervention studied. It is not a claim about any specific product.
Molecules & mechanisms in this paper
Each of these is named in the paper’s own words above. Open the monograph for the full mechanism and its other citations.
Cite this page
These citations point at this summary. To cite the original paper with its full author list, use the PubMed record or doi.org.
Magellan Longevity. (2026). Does low-load resistance training with blood-flow restriction (BFR-RT) produce similar increases in muscle strength and mass compared to conventional high-load resistance training (HL-RT)? [Plain-English summary of Sports Med 2018, PMID 29043659, DOI 10.1007/s40279-017-0795-y]. Magellan Longevity. https://magellanlongevity.com/study/d29043659.html@misc{magellan_d29043659,
title = {Does low-load resistance training with blood-flow restriction (BFR-RT) produce similar increases in muscle strength and mass compared to conventional high-load resistance training (HL-RT)?},
author = {{Magellan Longevity}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://magellanlongevity.com/study/d29043659.html}},
note = {Plain-English summary of PubMed PMID 29043659; DOI 10.1007/s40279-017-0795-y; Sports Med 2018. Reviewed by Gabriel Radu, DO},
urldate = {2026-08-11}
}https://magellanlongevity.com/study/d29043659.htmlRelated studies in the Magellan library
- How does low-load blood flow restriction (LL-BFR) training influence muscle mass and strength…Sports Med · 2019 · PMID 30306467
- Resistance training with blood flow restriction on muscle strength and hypertrophy in arthritisPLoS One · 2021 · PMID 34758045
- The Additive Effects of Creatine Supplementation and Exercise Training in an Aging PopulationJ Geriatr Phys Ther · 2020 · PMID 30762623
- Whole-body vibration on skeletal muscle mass index, physical fitness, and quality of life in…BMC Geriatr · 2018 · PMID 29343219
- What are the age-related physiological adaptations to regular exercise training, specifically…Front Biosci · 2018 · PMID 29293447
- Can intradialytic electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) improve muscle wasting, weakness, and…Artif Organs · 2018 · PMID 30069942
All 28 Magellan summaries on muscle, strength & physical function →
Prefer the interactive version? Open this summary in the Magellan app → · Browse all 314 study summaries →