MAGELLAN LONGEVITY
HomeResearchStudy library › Elevated Lipoprotein(a) and Risk of Atrial Fibrillation
Study summary · Cardiovascular & vascular aging

Does elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) increase the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF), and is this association independent of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD)?

In one paragraph

Elevated Lipoprotein(a), a Mendelian randomization analysis in 435,579 participants (J Am Coll Cardiol 2022, PMID 35450575) — in the UK Biobank, each 50 nmol/L increase in Lp(a) was associated with an increased risk of incident AF (measured Lp[a]: HR: 1.03; genetically predicted Lp[a]: OR: 1.03). Scope: 435,579 participants, and the abstract states no limitations.

Source: J Am Coll Cardiol 2022, PMID 35450575 ↗ · Research map · How Magellan grades evidence · evidence confidence: medium

J Am Coll Cardiol · 2022 · PMID 35450575 · DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.02.018

Plain-English summary written and published by Magellan Longevity · medical review by Gabriel Radu, DO (physiatrist, NPI 1376861765). We summarize what the paper reported — we did not run this study.

The takeaway

Elevated lipoprotein(a) is associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation, partly independent of its effects on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

The question

Does elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) increase the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF), and is this association independent of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD)?

What they tested

The study investigated the role of Lp(a) in AF and whether it is independent of ASCVD.

How they did it

The study analyzed measured and genetically predicted Lp(a) levels in relation to 20,432 cases of incident AF in the UK Biobank (N = 435,579). Mendelian randomization analyses were also conducted using summary-level data for AF from publicly available genome-wide association studies (N = 1,145,375).

What they found

In the UK Biobank, each 50 nmol/L increase in Lp(a) was associated with an increased risk of incident AF (measured Lp[a]: HR: 1.03; genetically predicted Lp[a]: OR: 1.03). Mendelian randomization analyses replicated this effect (OR: 1.04 per 50 nmol/L Lp[a] increase). Only 39% of Lp(a) risk was mediated through ASCVD, suggesting an independent influence on AF.

Increased Risk of Atrial Fibrillation per 50 nmol/L Increase in Lp(a)
Values shown: Hazard Ratio / Odds Ratio
Measured Lp(a) (UK Biobank)1.03
Genetically Predicted Lp(a) (UK Biobank)1.03
Mendelian Randomization (Independent Data)1.04

Each 50 nmol/L increase in Lp(a) was associated with an increased risk of incident AF across different analyses.

What it means

The findings suggest that Lp(a) is a potential causal mediator in the development of AF, with effects extending across myocardial tissues and partly independent of its known effects on ASCVD. Ongoing clinical trials for Lp(a)-lowering therapies should evaluate effects on AF prevention.

Limitations

The abstract does not explicitly state limitations of the study.

Where the published abstract does not list limitations, we say so rather than inventing them. Read the full paper on PubMed before drawing conclusions.

“genetically predicted Lp(a) associated with an increased risk of incident atrial fibrillation”— from the published abstract, J Am Coll Cardiol 2022

The paper at a glance

TitleElevated Lipoprotein(a) and Risk of Atrial Fibrillation
JournalJ Am Coll Cardiol
Year2022
PMID35450575 ↗
DOI10.1016/j.jacc.2022.02.018 ↗
TopicCardiovascular & vascular aging

Read the source: PubMed record (authors, abstract, full citation) ↗ · Publisher via doi.org ↗

Where Magellan uses this paper

This citation sits behind the evidence grade on the pages below. Grades are set from the research and are independent of affiliate commissions.

Lp(a) Mail-In Test

Large meta-analyses, prospective cohorts, and Mendelian randomization studies establish elevated Lp(a) as a causal, independent risk factor for coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, peripheral artery disease, and calcific aortic valve stenosis, with roughly one in five people carrying high…

Lp(a) Mail-In Test

Lipoprotein(a), or Lp(a), is a low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-like particle in which an…

Check price on Amazon ↗

Research describes the compound or intervention studied. It is not a claim about any specific product.

Cite this page

These citations point at this summary. To cite the original paper with its full author list, use the PubMed record or doi.org.

APA
Magellan Longevity. (2026). Does elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) increase the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF), and is this association independent of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD)? [Plain-English summary of J Am Coll Cardiol 2022, PMID 35450575, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.02.018]. Magellan Longevity. https://magellanlongevity.com/study/d35450575.html
BibTeX
@misc{magellan_d35450575, title = {Does elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) increase the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF), and is this association independent of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD)?}, author = {{Magellan Longevity}}, year = {2026}, howpublished = {\url{https://magellanlongevity.com/study/d35450575.html}}, note = {Plain-English summary of PubMed PMID 35450575; DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.02.018; J Am Coll Cardiol 2022. Reviewed by Gabriel Radu, DO}, urldate = {2026-08-11} }
Permalink
https://magellanlongevity.com/study/d35450575.html

Related studies in the Magellan library

All 67 Magellan summaries on cardiovascular & vascular aging →

How this summary was made. Every section above restates what the published abstract of PMID 35450575 reports — the question, the design, the numbers, the authors’ own conclusion and their stated limitations. We do not add claims the paper did not make, and we keep negative and no-effect findings in. Magellan’s evidence grades are set from research like this and never from affiliate commissions.

Prefer the interactive version? Open this summary in the Magellan app → · Browse all 314 study summaries →

Educational information, not medical advice. This is a plain-English summary of published research; it is not a treatment recommendation and nothing here is intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Individual studies can be wrong, and a single paper rarely settles a question. Talk to your physician before acting on any research, especially if you are pregnant, nursing, or taking medication.