MAGELLAN LONGEVITY
HomeResearchStudy library › Does a low level of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) increase mortality…
Study summary · Cardiovascular & vascular aging

Does a low level of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) increase mortality risk in a UK population without known diabetes or cardiovascular disease?

In one paragraph

HbA1c Home Kit, studied in 17,196 men (Diabetologia 2011, PMID 21584793) — spline regression indicated no increased risk at the low end of the distribution, with the HR for all-cause mortality remaining constant in the low range and only beginning to rise at approximately 5.5%. The abstract mentions that differences in population characteristics might explain contrary results of earlier studies, suggesting a potential limitation in generalizability to other populations.

Source: Diabetologia 2011, PMID 21584793 ↗ · Research map · How Magellan grades evidence · evidence confidence: high

Diabetologia · 2011 · PMID 21584793 · DOI 10.1007/s00125-011-2162-0

Plain-English summary written and published by Magellan Longevity · medical review by Gabriel Radu, DO (physiatrist, NPI 1376861765). We summarize what the paper reported — we did not run this study.

The takeaway

Low glycated hemoglobin levels do not appear to increase mortality risk in a non-diabetic UK population; risk only rises above 5.5%.

The question

Does a low level of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) increase mortality risk in a UK population without known diabetes or cardiovascular disease?

What they tested

The study aimed to examine the shape of the risk relationship between glycated hemoglobin and mortality, particularly addressing the debate about increased mortality risk associated with low levels of glycaemia.

How they did it

The study included 17,196 men and women aged 39-82 years from the EPIC-Norfolk Study, all without known diabetes or cardiovascular disease. Hazard ratios (HRs) for total and cause-specific mortality were estimated using Cox regression, comparing categories of glycated hemoglobin (<4.5%, 4.5% to <5.0%, 5.0% to <5.5% [reference], 5.5% to <6.0%, 6.0% to <6.5%, and ">="6.5%).

What they found

During a mean follow-up of 11.2 years, 1,953 participants died. The HR for all-cause mortality increased with increasing glycated hemoglobin categories. Spline regression indicated no increased risk at the low end of the distribution, with the HR for all-cause mortality remaining constant in the low range and only beginning to rise at approximately 5.5%. Similar associations were observed for cause-specific mortality, with the strongest link to cardiovascular mortality.

All-Cause Mortality Hazard Ratios by Glycated Hemoglobin Category
Values shown: Hazard Ratio
<4.5%0.94
4.5% to <5.0%0.99
5.0% to <5.5%1
5.5% to <6.0%1.1
6.0% to <6.5%1.29
">="6.5%1.45

Hazard ratios for all-cause mortality increase with higher glycated hemoglobin levels, with the reference category being 5.0% to <5.5%.

What it means

The findings in this large non-diabetic population do not support the concern about increased mortality risk associated with low glycated hemoglobin levels. Differences in population characteristics might account for conflicting results from previous studies and warrant further investigation.

Limitations

The abstract mentions that differences in population characteristics might explain contrary results of earlier studies, suggesting a potential limitation in generalizability to other populations.

“risk for all-cause mortality increased with categories of increasing glycated haemoglobin”— from the published abstract, Diabetologia 2011

The paper at a glance

Magellan’s evidence labelGlycated hemoglobin (3-month glucose) (our label for this citation — see PubMed for the paper’s own title and authors)
JournalDiabetologia
Year2011
PMID21584793 ↗
DOI10.1007/s00125-011-2162-0 ↗
TopicCardiovascular & vascular aging

Read the source: PubMed record (authors, abstract, full citation) ↗ · Publisher via doi.org ↗

Where Magellan uses this paper

This citation sits behind the evidence grade on the pages below. Grades are set from the research and are independent of affiliate commissions.

HbA1c Home Kit

Higher HbA1c raises all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Research relevant to this mechanism is indexed on PubMed and linked below; it describes the mechanism rather than this specific product.

Molecules & mechanisms in this paper

Each of these is named in the paper’s own words above. Open the monograph for the full mechanism and its other citations.

Cite this page

These citations point at this summary. To cite the original paper with its full author list, use the PubMed record or doi.org.

APA
Magellan Longevity. (2026). Does a low level of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) increase mortality risk in a UK population without known diabetes or cardiovascular disease? [Plain-English summary of Diabetologia 2011, PMID 21584793, DOI 10.1007/s00125-011-2162-0]. Magellan Longevity. https://magellanlongevity.com/study/s144.html
BibTeX
@misc{magellan_s144, title = {Does a low level of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) increase mortality risk in a UK population without known diabetes or cardiovascular disease?}, author = {{Magellan Longevity}}, year = {2026}, howpublished = {\url{https://magellanlongevity.com/study/s144.html}}, note = {Plain-English summary of PubMed PMID 21584793; DOI 10.1007/s00125-011-2162-0; Diabetologia 2011. Reviewed by Gabriel Radu, DO}, urldate = {2026-08-11} }
Permalink
https://magellanlongevity.com/study/s144.html

Related studies in the Magellan library

All 67 Magellan summaries on cardiovascular & vascular aging →

How this summary was made. Every section above restates what the published abstract of PMID 21584793 reports — the question, the design, the numbers, the authors’ own conclusion and their stated limitations. We do not add claims the paper did not make, and we keep negative and no-effect findings in. Magellan’s evidence grades are set from research like this and never from affiliate commissions.

Prefer the interactive version? Open this summary in the Magellan app → · Browse all 314 study summaries →

Educational information, not medical advice. This is a plain-English summary of published research; it is not a treatment recommendation and nothing here is intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Individual studies can be wrong, and a single paper rarely settles a question. Talk to your physician before acting on any research, especially if you are pregnant, nursing, or taking medication.