MAGELLAN LONGEVITY
HomeResearchStudy library › Sunscreen and prevention of skin aging
Study summary · Skin, hair & photoaging

Does regular use of sunscreen or β-carotene supplements retard skin aging, as measured by photoaging, compared to discretionary use or placebo?

Ann Intern Med · 2013 · PMID 23732711 · DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-158-11-201306040-00002

Plain-English summary written and published by Magellan Longevity · medical review by Gabriel Radu, DO (physiatrist, NPI 1376861765). We summarize what the paper reported — we did not run this study.

The takeaway

Daily sunscreen use significantly reduces skin aging, while β-carotene supplements showed no overall benefit.

The question

Does regular use of sunscreen or β-carotene supplements retard skin aging, as measured by photoaging, compared to discretionary use or placebo?

What they tested

Regular use of sunscreen and/or β-carotene supplements will retard skin aging.

How they did it

This was a randomized, controlled, community-based intervention conducted in Nambour, Australia. 903 adults younger than 55 years were randomly assigned to one of four groups: daily broad-spectrum sunscreen and 30 mg β-carotene, daily sunscreen and placebo, discretionary sunscreen and 30 mg β-carotene, or discretionary sunscreen and placebo. The change in microtopography between 1992 and 1996 was graded by blinded assessors to measure skin aging.

What they found

The daily sunscreen group showed no detectable increase in skin aging after 4.5 years. Skin aging from baseline to the end of the trial was 24% less in the daily sunscreen group compared to the discretionary sunscreen group. β-carotene supplementation had no overall effect on skin aging.

Reduction in Skin Aging with Daily Sunscreen Use
Values shown: Reduction in Skin Aging (%)
Daily Sunscreen Group24
Discretionary Sunscreen Group0

Skin aging was 24% less in the daily sunscreen group compared to the discretionary sunscreen group.

What it means

Regular sunscreen use retards skin aging in healthy, middle-aged men and women. No overall effect of β-carotene on skin aging was identified.

Limitations

Some outcome data were missing, and the study's power to detect moderate treatment effects was modest.

“regular sunscreen use retards skin aging in middle-aged men and women”— from the published abstract, Ann Intern Med 2013

The paper at a glance

TitleSunscreen and prevention of skin aging: a randomized trial.
JournalAnn Intern Med
Year2013
PMID23732711 ↗
DOI10.7326/0003-4819-158-11-201306040-00002 ↗
TopicSkin, hair & photoaging

Read the source: PubMed record (authors, abstract, full citation) ↗ · Publisher via doi.org ↗

Where Magellan uses this paper

This citation sits behind the evidence grade on the pages below. Grades are set from the research and are independent of affiliate commissions.

Daily Mineral SPF Sunscreen

In a randomized community-based trial in Australia, adults assigned to daily sunscreen showed no detectable increase in skin aging over 4.5 years and about 24% less photoaging than discretionary users;

Daily Mineral SPF Sunscreen

Sunscreens are topical photoprotective products that reduce the amount of ultraviolet (UV) radiation…

Check price on Amazon ↗

Research describes the compound or intervention studied. It is not a claim about any specific product.

Cite this page

These citations point at this summary. To cite the original paper with its full author list, use the PubMed record or doi.org.

APA
Magellan Longevity. (2026). Does regular use of sunscreen or β-carotene supplements retard skin aging, as measured by photoaging, compared to discretionary use or placebo? [Plain-English summary of Ann Intern Med 2013, PMID 23732711, DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-158-11-201306040-00002]. Magellan Longevity. https://magellanlongevity.com/study/s185.html
BibTeX
@misc{magellan_s185, title = {Does regular use of sunscreen or β-carotene supplements retard skin aging, as measured by photoaging, compared to discretionary use or placebo?}, author = {{Magellan Longevity}}, year = {2026}, howpublished = {\url{https://magellanlongevity.com/study/s185.html}}, note = {Plain-English summary of PubMed PMID 23732711; DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-158-11-201306040-00002; Ann Intern Med 2013. Reviewed by Gabriel Radu, DO}, urldate = {2026-08-11} }
Permalink
https://magellanlongevity.com/study/s185.html

Related studies in the Magellan library

All 32 Magellan summaries on skin, hair & photoaging →

How this summary was made. Every section above restates what the published abstract of PMID 23732711 reports — the question, the design, the numbers, the authors’ own conclusion and their stated limitations. We do not add claims the paper did not make, and we keep negative and no-effect findings in. Magellan’s evidence grades are set from research like this and never from affiliate commissions.

Prefer the interactive version? Open this summary in the Magellan app → · Browse all 314 study summaries →

Educational information, not medical advice. This is a plain-English summary of published research; it is not a treatment recommendation and nothing here is intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Individual studies can be wrong, and a single paper rarely settles a question. Talk to your physician before acting on any research, especially if you are pregnant, nursing, or taking medication.