MAGELLAN LONGEVITY
HomeResearchStudy library › Sleep duration and risk of all-cause mortality
Study summary · Sleep, circadian rhythm & stress

What is the association between sleep duration and the risk of all-cause mortality in adults?

In one paragraph

Nasal-Breathing Sleep Tape, a systematic review and meta-analysis (Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 2018, PMID 30058510) — no significant difference was found between the <7 hours group and the 7-9 hours reference group (RD 0.00, 95% CI 0.00-0.01). No significant difference was found between the 9 hours) and higher all-cause mortality.

Source: Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 2018, PMID 30058510 ↗ · Research map · How Magellan grades evidence · evidence confidence: high

Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences · 2018 · PMID 30058510 · DOI 10.1017/S2045796018000379

Plain-English summary written and published by Magellan Longevity · medical review by Gabriel Radu, DO (physiatrist, NPI 1376861765). We summarize what the paper reported — we did not run this study.

The takeaway

Sleeping more than 9 hours per night is associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality, but this might be due to underlying health issues.

The question

What is the association between sleep duration and the risk of all-cause mortality in adults?

What they tested

The study aimed to determine the association between sleep duration and all-cause mortality, with planned comparisons of sleep durations less than 7 hours and greater than 9 hours against a reference of 7-9 hours.

How they did it

A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies were conducted using MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, and LILACS databases, along with other databases and unpublished literature. The risk of bias was assessed using a modified Cochrane Collaboration's tool. A random effects analysis was performed, with all-cause mortality as the primary outcome and risk difference (RD) with 95% confidence intervals as the effect measure. Comparisons were made between <7 hours of sleep versus 7-9 hours, and >9 hours of sleep versus 7-9 hours.

What they found

Thirty-nine studies were included in the qualitative analysis. For quantitative analysis, 19 studies compared <7 hours of sleep to 7-9 hours, and 18 studies compared >9 hours to 7-9 hours. Most studies showed a low risk of bias. The overall risk difference for all-cause mortality was 0.09 (95% CI 0.07-0.11) when comparing the >9 hours group to the 7-9 hours reference, favoring the reference group. No significant difference was found between the <7 hours group and the 7-9 hours reference group (RD 0.00, 95% CI 0.00-0.01).

Risk Difference for All-Cause Mortality by Sleep Duration
Values shown: Risk Difference
>9 hours vs. 7-9 hours0.09
<7 hours vs. 7-9 hours0

The risk difference (RD) for all-cause mortality when comparing sleep durations to a 7-9 hour reference. A positive RD indicates higher mortality in the compared group.

What it means

There is a probable association between long sleep duration (>9 hours) and higher all-cause mortality. However, no significant association was found for short sleep duration (<7 hours) compared to the 7-9 hour reference.

Limitations

The observed association between long sleep duration and higher mortality might reflect underlying systemic or neurological diseases that cause sleep fragmentation, deterioration in quality, and micro-awakenings, rather than long sleep duration itself being a direct cause.

“Both short and long sleep duration were associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in this meta-analysis.”— from the published abstract, Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 2018

The paper at a glance

TitleSleep duration and risk of all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
JournalEpidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
Year2018
PMID30058510 ↗
DOI10.1017/S2045796018000379 ↗
TopicSleep, circadian rhythm & stress

Read the source: PubMed record (authors, abstract, full citation) ↗ · Publisher via doi.org ↗

Where Magellan uses this paper

This citation sits behind the evidence grade on the pages below. Grades are set from the research and are independent of affiliate commissions.

Biometric Wearables (Sleep, HRV & Recovery)

Across brands, independent validations find these devices agree closely with polysomnography for sleep-versus-wake detection and with ECG for heart rate and time-domain HRV (RMSSD), while four-stage sleep staging is only moderate (roughly 50-75% agreement) and energy-expenditure estimates are poor;

Blue-Light Management & Circadian Lighting

Controlled evidence for blue-light blocking glasses is mixed and, for everyday computer users, largely unsupportive: a Cochrane review of 17 randomized trials and a separate meta-analysis found they probably do not reduce eye strain or reliably improve sleep, and no protective effect on the retina has been…

SYB Clear Blue Light Glasses

Blue-light blocking glasses (also called blue-blocking or amber lenses) are spectacles whose lenses…

Check price on Amazon ↗

Garmin Forerunner 265

Consumer biometric wearables—smartwatches, wrist-worn bands and finger rings from makers such as Apple…

Check price on Amazon ↗

Oura Ring Gen 4

Consumer biometric wearables—smartwatches, wrist-worn bands and finger rings from makers such as Apple…

Check price on Amazon ↗

Apple Watch Series 11

Consumer biometric wearables—smartwatches, wrist-worn bands and finger rings from makers such as Apple…

Check price on Amazon ↗

WHOOP Band 5.0

Consumer biometric wearables—smartwatches, wrist-worn bands and finger rings from makers such as Apple…

Check price on Amazon ↗

Garmin Vivoactive 6

Consumer biometric wearables—smartwatches, wrist-worn bands and finger rings from makers such as Apple…

Check price on Amazon ↗

Research describes the compound or intervention studied. It is not a claim about any specific product.

Molecules & mechanisms in this paper

Each of these is named in the paper’s own words above. Open the monograph for the full mechanism and its other citations.

Cite this page

These citations point at this summary. To cite the original paper with its full author list, use the PubMed record or doi.org.

APA
Magellan Longevity. (2026). What is the association between sleep duration and the risk of all-cause mortality in adults? [Plain-English summary of Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 2018, PMID 30058510, DOI 10.1017/S2045796018000379]. Magellan Longevity. https://magellanlongevity.com/study/sleep_mortality.html
BibTeX
@misc{magellan_sleep_mortality, title = {What is the association between sleep duration and the risk of all-cause mortality in adults?}, author = {{Magellan Longevity}}, year = {2026}, howpublished = {\url{https://magellanlongevity.com/study/sleep_mortality.html}}, note = {Plain-English summary of PubMed PMID 30058510; DOI 10.1017/S2045796018000379; Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 2018. Reviewed by Gabriel Radu, DO}, urldate = {2026-08-11} }
Permalink
https://magellanlongevity.com/study/sleep_mortality.html

Related studies in the Magellan library

All 23 Magellan summaries on sleep, circadian rhythm & stress →

How this summary was made. Every section above restates what the published abstract of PMID 30058510 reports — the question, the design, the numbers, the authors’ own conclusion and their stated limitations. We do not add claims the paper did not make, and we keep negative and no-effect findings in. Magellan’s evidence grades are set from research like this and never from affiliate commissions.

Prefer the interactive version? Open this summary in the Magellan app → · Browse all 314 study summaries →

Educational information, not medical advice. This is a plain-English summary of published research; it is not a treatment recommendation and nothing here is intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Individual studies can be wrong, and a single paper rarely settles a question. Talk to your physician before acting on any research, especially if you are pregnant, nursing, or taking medication.