MAGELLAN LONGEVITY
HomeResearchStudy library › Assessment of Noninvasive Oxygen Saturation During Pulmonary…
Study summary · General aging biology & healthspan

Can wearable devices accurately measure oxygen saturation (S) in patients with COPD at rest and after physical exercise during pulmonary rehabilitation?

In one paragraph

Wearable Pulse Oximeter, a cross-sectional study in 36 participants (Respir Care 2023, PMID 37193599) — for the Apple Watch, the root mean squared error (RMSE) was 3.5% at rest, 4.1% after the 30-s sit-to-stand test, and 3.9% after the 6MWT. Scope: 36 participants, and the abstract states no limitations.

Source: Respir Care 2023, PMID 37193599 ↗ · Research map · How Magellan grades evidence · evidence confidence: medium

Respir Care · 2023 · PMID 37193599 · DOI 10.4187/respcare.10760

Plain-English summary written and published by Magellan Longevity · medical review by Gabriel Radu, DO (physiatrist, NPI 1376861765). We summarize what the paper reported — we did not run this study.

The takeaway

Smartwatches are not accurate enough to monitor oxygen saturation in COPD patients during pulmonary rehabilitation.

The question

Can wearable devices accurately measure oxygen saturation (S) in patients with COPD at rest and after physical exercise during pulmonary rehabilitation?

What they tested

The study aimed to examine the accuracy of S readings from wearable devices in patients with COPD, implying a question about their reliability compared to a standard pulse oximeter.

How they did it

This cross-sectional study included 36 participants with COPD (20 women, ages 52-89). Oxygen saturation was measured concurrently using a Contec Pulse Oximeter CMS50D (comparator), an Apple Watch Series 7, and a Garmin Vivosmart 4. Measurements were taken at rest, immediately after a 30-s sit-to-stand test, and after a 6-min walk test (6MWT).

What they found

For the Apple Watch, the root mean squared error (RMSE) was 3.5% at rest, 4.1% after the 30-s sit-to-stand test, and 3.9% after the 6MWT. For the Garmin Vivosmart, RMSE was 3.3% at rest, 6.1% after the 30-s sit-to-stand test, and 5.4% after the 6MWT. Both devices showed considerable measurement variance and tended to be less accurate at lower saturation levels.

Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of Smartwatches vs. Pulse Oximeter
Values shown: RMSE (%)
Apple Watch - Rest3.5
Apple Watch - Sit-to-Stand4.1
Apple Watch - 6MWT3.9
Garmin Vivosmart - Rest3.3
Garmin Vivosmart - Sit-to-Stand6.1
Garmin Vivosmart - 6MWT5.4

Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) values indicate the deviation of smartwatch oxygen saturation readings compared to a pulse oximeter at rest and after two exercise tests.

What it means

The Apple Watch Series 7 and Garmin Vivosmart 4 overestimated S when it was < 95% and underestimated it when S was > 95% in participants with COPD. Wearable devices should not be used for monitoring oxygen saturation during pulmonary rehabilitation.

Limitations

The abstract does not explicitly state limitations beyond the observed inaccuracies of the devices, which inherently limit their utility.

Where the published abstract does not list limitations, we say so rather than inventing them. Read the full paper on PubMed before drawing conclusions.

“monitoring peripheral oxygen saturation during pulmonary rehabilitation is recommended”— from the published abstract, Respir Care 2023

The paper at a glance

TitleAssessment of Noninvasive Oxygen Saturation During Pulmonary Rehabilitation: Smartwatch versus Pulse Oximeter
JournalRespir Care
Year2023
PMID37193599 ↗
DOI10.4187/respcare.10760 ↗
TopicGeneral aging biology & healthspan

Read the source: PubMed record (authors, abstract, full citation) ↗ · Publisher via doi.org ↗

Where Magellan uses this paper

This citation sits behind the evidence grade on the pages below. Grades are set from the research and are independent of affiliate commissions.

Wearable Pulse Oximeter

Research on the biomarker this device tracks - blood-oxygen saturation and nocturnal hypoxemia - links greater overnight oxygen desaturation (quantified as the sleep apnea-specific 'hypoxic burden') to higher risks of hypertension, cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, and cognitive decline in large cohorts…

Wearable Pulse Oximeter

A wearable pulse oximeter is a non-invasive device that estimates peripheral blood-oxygen saturation…

Check price on Amazon ↗

Research describes the compound or intervention studied. It is not a claim about any specific product.

Cite this page

These citations point at this summary. To cite the original paper with its full author list, use the PubMed record or doi.org.

APA
Magellan Longevity. (2026). Can wearable devices accurately measure oxygen saturation (S) in patients with COPD at rest and after physical exercise during pulmonary rehabilitation? [Plain-English summary of Respir Care 2023, PMID 37193599, DOI 10.4187/respcare.10760]. Magellan Longevity. https://magellanlongevity.com/study/d37193599.html
BibTeX
@misc{magellan_d37193599, title = {Can wearable devices accurately measure oxygen saturation (S) in patients with COPD at rest and after physical exercise during pulmonary rehabilitation?}, author = {{Magellan Longevity}}, year = {2026}, howpublished = {\url{https://magellanlongevity.com/study/d37193599.html}}, note = {Plain-English summary of PubMed PMID 37193599; DOI 10.4187/respcare.10760; Respir Care 2023. Reviewed by Gabriel Radu, DO}, urldate = {2026-08-11} }
Permalink
https://magellanlongevity.com/study/d37193599.html

Related studies in the Magellan library

All 25 Magellan summaries on general aging biology & healthspan →

How this summary was made. Every section above restates what the published abstract of PMID 37193599 reports — the question, the design, the numbers, the authors’ own conclusion and their stated limitations. We do not add claims the paper did not make, and we keep negative and no-effect findings in. Magellan’s evidence grades are set from research like this and never from affiliate commissions.

Prefer the interactive version? Open this summary in the Magellan app → · Browse all 314 study summaries →

Educational information, not medical advice. This is a plain-English summary of published research; it is not a treatment recommendation and nothing here is intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Individual studies can be wrong, and a single paper rarely settles a question. Talk to your physician before acting on any research, especially if you are pregnant, nursing, or taking medication.