MAGELLAN LONGEVITY
HomeResearchStudy library › Effects of 12-week whole-body vibration training versus resistance…
Study summary · Muscle, strength & physical function

What are the effects of 12-week whole-body vibration training (WBVT) versus resistance training (RT) on body composition, muscle strength, physical performance, and blood biomarkers in older people with sarcopenia?

In one paragraph

Whole-Body Vibration Plate, a randomized controlled trial in 27 older people (Sci Rep 2025, PMID 40011687) — after 12 weeks, the WBVT group showed significant improvements in body weight, BMI, PBF, ASMI, KES, GS, SPPB, 5CST, IGF-1, growth hormone, FST, CK, and quality of life. Scope: 27 older people, and the abstract states no limitations.

Source: Sci Rep 2025, PMID 40011687 ↗ · Research map · How Magellan grades evidence · evidence confidence: medium

Sci Rep · 2025 · PMID 40011687 · DOI 10.1038/s41598-025-91644-2

Plain-English summary written and published by Magellan Longevity · medical review by Gabriel Radu, DO (physiatrist, NPI 1376861765). We summarize what the paper reported — we did not run this study.

The takeaway

Both whole-body vibration and resistance training improve physical health in older adults with sarcopenia, with resistance training being better for muscle strength.

The question

What are the effects of 12-week whole-body vibration training (WBVT) versus resistance training (RT) on body composition, muscle strength, physical performance, and blood biomarkers in older people with sarcopenia?

What they tested

The study hypothesized that both WBVT and RT would improve physical condition in older people with sarcopenia, with a potential for differential effects on specific outcomes.

How they did it

This was a 12-week, 3-times-weekly, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial involving 27 older people with sarcopenia (aged ">= 65 years). Participants were randomized into a WBVT group (n = 14) and an RT group (n = 13). Primary outcome was knee extension strength (KES), with secondary outcomes including body composition, muscle strength, physical performance, blood biomarkers, and quality of life.

What they found

After 12 weeks, the WBVT group showed significant improvements in body weight, BMI, PBF, ASMI, KES, GS, SPPB, 5CST, IGF-1, growth hormone, FST, CK, and quality of life. The RT group showed significant improvements in body weight, BMI, PBF, KES, GS, SPPB, growth hormone, FST, CK, and quality of life. Between-group comparisons revealed significant differences only for KES (P = 0.007) and the role-physical dimension of the SF-36 (P = 007), with RT excelling in KES.

Between-Group Comparison P-values
Values shown: P-value
Knee Extension Strength (KES)0.007
SF-36 Role-Physical (RP)0.007

P-values for outcomes showing significant differences between the WBVT and RT groups.

What it means

Both whole-body vibration training and resistance training improved the physical condition of older people with sarcopenia. Resistance training was superior in improving muscle strength (KES), while whole-body vibration training offers a valuable alternative, especially for individuals with physical restrictions, due to its low risk and flexibility.

Limitations

The abstract does not explicitly state limitations of the study.

Where the published abstract does not list limitations, we say so rather than inventing them. Read the full paper on PubMed before drawing conclusions.

“whole-body vibration training improved body composition, muscle strength, and physical performance”— from the published abstract, Sci Rep 2025

The paper at a glance

TitleEffects of 12-week whole-body vibration training versus resistance training in older people with sarcopenia
JournalSci Rep
Year2025
PMID40011687 ↗
DOI10.1038/s41598-025-91644-2 ↗
TopicMuscle, strength & physical function

Read the source: PubMed record (authors, abstract, full citation) ↗ · Publisher via doi.org ↗

Where Magellan uses this paper

This citation sits behind the evidence grade on the pages below. Grades are set from the research and are independent of affiliate commissions.

Whole-Body Vibration Plate

Randomized trials and meta-analyses, mostly in postmenopausal women and older adults, suggest whole-body vibration improves lower-limb muscle strength (knee-extension SMD about 0.7 in one 18-trial analysis), balance, and everyday function such as sit-to-stand and walking speed, and may aid glycemic control in type 2…

Whole-Body Vibration Plate

A whole-body vibration (WBV) plate, or vibration platform, is a motorized device that generates rapid…

Check price on Amazon ↗

Research describes the compound or intervention studied. It is not a claim about any specific product.

Molecules & mechanisms in this paper

Each of these is named in the paper’s own words above. Open the monograph for the full mechanism and its other citations.

Cite this page

These citations point at this summary. To cite the original paper with its full author list, use the PubMed record or doi.org.

APA
Magellan Longevity. (2026). What are the effects of 12-week whole-body vibration training (WBVT) versus resistance training (RT) on body composition, muscle strength, physical performance, and blood biomarkers in older people with sarcopenia? [Plain-English summary of Sci Rep 2025, PMID 40011687, DOI 10.1038/s41598-025-91644-2]. Magellan Longevity. https://magellanlongevity.com/study/d40011687.html
BibTeX
@misc{magellan_d40011687, title = {What are the effects of 12-week whole-body vibration training (WBVT) versus resistance training (RT) on body composition, muscle strength, physical performance, and blood biomarkers in older people with sarcopenia?}, author = {{Magellan Longevity}}, year = {2026}, howpublished = {\url{https://magellanlongevity.com/study/d40011687.html}}, note = {Plain-English summary of PubMed PMID 40011687; DOI 10.1038/s41598-025-91644-2; Sci Rep 2025. Reviewed by Gabriel Radu, DO}, urldate = {2026-08-11} }
Permalink
https://magellanlongevity.com/study/d40011687.html

Related studies in the Magellan library

All 28 Magellan summaries on muscle, strength & physical function →

How this summary was made. Every section above restates what the published abstract of PMID 40011687 reports — the question, the design, the numbers, the authors’ own conclusion and their stated limitations. We do not add claims the paper did not make, and we keep negative and no-effect findings in. Magellan’s evidence grades are set from research like this and never from affiliate commissions.

Prefer the interactive version? Open this summary in the Magellan app → · Browse all 314 study summaries →

Educational information, not medical advice. This is a plain-English summary of published research; it is not a treatment recommendation and nothing here is intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Individual studies can be wrong, and a single paper rarely settles a question. Talk to your physician before acting on any research, especially if you are pregnant, nursing, or taking medication.