MAGELLAN LONGEVITY
HomeResearchStudy library › An epigenetic biomarker of aging for lifespan and healthspan
Study summary · Biological age, epigenetics & aging clocks

Can a new epigenetic biomarker of aging, developed using composite clinical measures of phenotypic age, more accurately predict lifespan and healthspan outcomes compared to existing biomarkers?

In one paragraph

Epigenetic Age (Aging 2018, PMID 29676998) — increased epigenetic age relative to chronological age was associated with increased activation of pro-inflammatory and interferon pathways, and decreased activation of transcriptional/translational machinery, DNA damage response, and mitochondrial signatures. No numeric effect size is reported for Epigenetic Age in the source abstract.

Source: Aging 2018, PMID 29676998 ↗ · Research map · How Magellan grades evidence · evidence confidence: low

Aging · 2018 · PMID 29676998 · DOI 10.18632/aging.101414

Plain-English summary written and published by Magellan Longevity · medical review by Gabriel Radu, DO (physiatrist, NPI 1376861765). We summarize what the paper reported — we did not run this study.

The takeaway

A new epigenetic biomarker, DNAm PhenoAge, is a more accurate predictor of various aging-related health outcomes than previous methods.

The question

Can a new epigenetic biomarker of aging, developed using composite clinical measures of phenotypic age, more accurately predict lifespan and healthspan outcomes compared to existing biomarkers?

What they tested

Incorporating composite clinical measures of phenotypic age, which capture differences in lifespan and healthspan, will identify novel CpGs and lead to a more powerful epigenetic biomarker of aging than those developed using chronological age alone.

How they did it

The researchers developed a new epigenetic biomarker, DNAm PhenoAge, using an innovative two-step process. This biomarker was developed using data from whole blood. They then tested its correlation with age in various tissues and cells and performed an in-depth transcriptional analysis in sorted cells to understand associated pathways.

What they found

DNAm PhenoAge strongly outperformed previous measures in predicting various aging outcomes, including all-cause mortality, cancers, healthspan, physical functioning, and Alzheimer's disease. This biomarker correlated strongly with age in every tissue and cell tested. Increased epigenetic age relative to chronological age was associated with increased activation of pro-inflammatory and interferon pathways, and decreased activation of transcriptional/translational machinery, DNA damage response, and mitochondrial signatures.

What it means

DNAm PhenoAge is a single epigenetic biomarker of aging that effectively captures risks for diverse outcomes across multiple tissues and cells and provides insights into important aging pathways.

Limitations

The abstract does not explicitly state any limitations of the study.

Where the published abstract does not list limitations, we say so rather than inventing them. Read the full paper on PubMed before drawing conclusions.

“This epigenetic biomarker of aging strongly predicts lifespan and healthspan, outperforming earlier measures and capturing risk across multiple age-related conditions.”— from the published abstract, Aging 2018

The paper at a glance

TitleAn epigenetic biomarker of aging for lifespan and healthspan
JournalAging
Year2018
PMID29676998 ↗
DOI10.18632/aging.101414 ↗
TopicBiological age, epigenetics & aging clocks

Read the source: PubMed record (authors, abstract, full citation) ↗ · Publisher via doi.org ↗

Where Magellan uses this paper

This citation sits behind the evidence grade on the pages below. Grades are set from the research and are independent of affiliate commissions.

Comprehensive Blood-Biomarker Testing

Many of the strongest predictors of healthy aging (glucose control, inflammation, lipid and hormonal balance) are silent until measured. Regular biomarker tracking turns aging into a set of actionable numbers and lets interventions be tailored and monitored objectively.

Epigenetic Age (DNA-Methylation Clock) Testing

DNA-methylation clocks are among the strongest available predictors of lifespan and healthspan, and second-generation clocks predict mortality risk across many conditions. They provide an objective baseline and a way to measure whether longevity interventions are moving biological age in the right direction.

Molecules & mechanisms in this paper

Each of these is named in the paper’s own words above. Open the monograph for the full mechanism and its other citations.

Cite this page

These citations point at this summary. To cite the original paper with its full author list, use the PubMed record or doi.org.

APA
Magellan Longevity. (2026). Can a new epigenetic biomarker of aging, developed using composite clinical measures of phenotypic age, more accurately predict lifespan and healthspan outcomes compared to existing biomarkers? [Plain-English summary of Aging 2018, PMID 29676998, DOI 10.18632/aging.101414]. Magellan Longevity. https://magellanlongevity.com/study/epigenetic_clock.html
BibTeX
@misc{magellan_epigenetic_clock, title = {Can a new epigenetic biomarker of aging, developed using composite clinical measures of phenotypic age, more accurately predict lifespan and healthspan outcomes compared to existing biomarkers?}, author = {{Magellan Longevity}}, year = {2026}, howpublished = {\url{https://magellanlongevity.com/study/epigenetic_clock.html}}, note = {Plain-English summary of PubMed PMID 29676998; DOI 10.18632/aging.101414; Aging 2018. Reviewed by Gabriel Radu, DO}, urldate = {2026-08-11} }
Permalink
https://magellanlongevity.com/study/epigenetic_clock.html

Related studies in the Magellan library

All 5 Magellan summaries on biological age, epigenetics & aging clocks →

How this summary was made. Every section above restates what the published abstract of PMID 29676998 reports — the question, the design, the numbers, the authors’ own conclusion and their stated limitations. We do not add claims the paper did not make, and we keep negative and no-effect findings in. Magellan’s evidence grades are set from research like this and never from affiliate commissions.

Prefer the interactive version? Open this summary in the Magellan app → · Browse all 314 study summaries →

Educational information, not medical advice. This is a plain-English summary of published research; it is not a treatment recommendation and nothing here is intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Individual studies can be wrong, and a single paper rarely settles a question. Talk to your physician before acting on any research, especially if you are pregnant, nursing, or taking medication.