MAGELLAN LONGEVITY
HomeResearchStudy library › What are the associations of lower eGFR (based on creatinine alone…
Study summary · General aging biology & healthspan

What are the associations of lower eGFR (based on creatinine alone or combined with cystatin C) and more severe albuminuria with adverse kidney outcomes, cardiovascular outcomes, and other health outcomes?

In one paragraph

Cystatin C / eGFR Kidney Test, a meta-analysis in 27,503,140 individuals (JAMA 2023, PMID 37787795) — for example, among individuals with UACR less than 10 mg/g, an eGFR of 45 to 59 mL/min/1.73 m2 based on creatinine alone was associated with significantly higher hospitalization rates compared to an eGFR of 90 to 104 mL/min/1.73 m2. Scope: 27,503,140 individuals, and the abstract states no limitations.

Source: JAMA 2023, PMID 37787795 ↗ · Research map · How Magellan grades evidence · evidence confidence: medium

JAMA · 2023 · PMID 37787795 · DOI 10.1001/jama.2023.17002

Plain-English summary written and published by Magellan Longevity · medical review by Gabriel Radu, DO (physiatrist, NPI 1376861765). We summarize what the paper reported — we did not run this study.

The takeaway

Lower kidney function and higher albuminuria are linked to increased risks of kidney failure, cardiovascular disease, and hospitalizations.

The question

What are the associations of lower eGFR (based on creatinine alone or combined with cystatin C) and more severe albuminuria with adverse kidney outcomes, cardiovascular outcomes, and other health outcomes?

What they tested

Lower eGFR based on creatinine alone, lower eGFR based on creatinine combined with cystatin C, and more severe albuminuria will be associated with adverse kidney outcomes, cardiovascular outcomes, and other health outcomes.

How they did it

This was an individual-participant data meta-analysis of 114 global cohorts from 1980 to 2021. The study included 27,503,140 individuals for eGFR based on creatinine alone, 720,736 individuals for eGFR based on creatinine and cystatin C, and 9,067,753 individuals for albuminuria. eGFR was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration 2021 equations, and albuminuria was estimated as urine albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR). The risks of 10 adverse outcomes were analyzed within each cohort and summarized with random-effects meta-analyses.

What they found

Lower eGFR (whether based on creatinine alone or based on creatinine and cystatin C) and higher UACR were each significantly associated with a higher risk for all 10 adverse outcomes, even in the mildest categories of chronic kidney disease. For example, among individuals with UACR less than 10 mg/g, an eGFR of 45 to 59 mL/min/1.73 m2 based on creatinine alone was associated with significantly higher hospitalization rates compared to an eGFR of 90 to 104 mL/min/1.73 m2. This represented an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.3 and an excess absolute risk of 22 events per 1000 person-years.

Hospitalization Rates by eGFR Category (UACR < 10 mg/g)
Values shown: Events per 1000 person-years
eGFR 90-104 mL/min/1.73 m279
eGFR 45-59 mL/min/1.73 m2161

Among people with a UACR less than 10 mg/g, hospitalization rates were higher for those with lower eGFR based on creatinine alone.

What it means

Lower eGFR, whether based on creatinine alone or combined with cystatin C, and more severe UACR are each associated with increased rates of adverse kidney outcomes, cardiovascular diseases, and hospitalizations.

Limitations

The abstract does not explicitly state limitations of the study.

Where the published abstract does not list limitations, we say so rather than inventing them. Read the full paper on PubMed before drawing conclusions.

“lower eGFR was associated with increased rates of adverse outcomes”— from the published abstract, JAMA 2023

The paper at a glance

Magellan’s evidence labelCystatin C-based eGFR (our label for this citation — see PubMed for the paper’s own title and authors)
JournalJAMA
Year2023
PMID37787795 ↗
DOI10.1001/jama.2023.17002 ↗
TopicGeneral aging biology & healthspan

Read the source: PubMed record (authors, abstract, full citation) ↗ · Publisher via doi.org ↗

Where Magellan uses this paper

This citation sits behind the evidence grade on the pages below. Grades are set from the research and are independent of affiliate commissions.

Cystatin C / eGFR Kidney Test

Across large cohorts and meta-analyses, cystatin C-based eGFR is at least as accurate as creatinine-based eGFR and is more strongly associated with death, cardiovascular events, and end-stage kidney disease—in one ~90,750-person consortium meta-analysis it markedly improved risk reclassification for death—and it…

Cystatin C / eGFR Kidney Test

Cystatin C is a low-molecular-weight protein produced at a nearly constant rate by all nucleated cells…

Check price on Amazon ↗

Research describes the compound or intervention studied. It is not a claim about any specific product.

Cite this page

These citations point at this summary. To cite the original paper with its full author list, use the PubMed record or doi.org.

APA
Magellan Longevity. (2026). What are the associations of lower eGFR (based on creatinine alone or combined with cystatin C) and more severe albuminuria with adverse kidney outcomes, cardiovascular outcomes, and other health outcomes? [Plain-English summary of JAMA 2023, PMID 37787795, DOI 10.1001/jama.2023.17002]. Magellan Longevity. https://magellanlongevity.com/study/s157.html
BibTeX
@misc{magellan_s157, title = {What are the associations of lower eGFR (based on creatinine alone or combined with cystatin C) and more severe albuminuria with adverse kidney outcomes, cardiovascular outcomes, and other health outcomes?}, author = {{Magellan Longevity}}, year = {2026}, howpublished = {\url{https://magellanlongevity.com/study/s157.html}}, note = {Plain-English summary of PubMed PMID 37787795; DOI 10.1001/jama.2023.17002; JAMA 2023. Reviewed by Gabriel Radu, DO}, urldate = {2026-08-11} }
Permalink
https://magellanlongevity.com/study/s157.html

Related studies in the Magellan library

All 25 Magellan summaries on general aging biology & healthspan →

How this summary was made. Every section above restates what the published abstract of PMID 37787795 reports — the question, the design, the numbers, the authors’ own conclusion and their stated limitations. We do not add claims the paper did not make, and we keep negative and no-effect findings in. Magellan’s evidence grades are set from research like this and never from affiliate commissions.

Prefer the interactive version? Open this summary in the Magellan app → · Browse all 314 study summaries →

Educational information, not medical advice. This is a plain-English summary of published research; it is not a treatment recommendation and nothing here is intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Individual studies can be wrong, and a single paper rarely settles a question. Talk to your physician before acting on any research, especially if you are pregnant, nursing, or taking medication.