MAGELLAN LONGEVITY
HomeResearchStudy library › Effect of percussion massage therapy on recovery of delayed onset…
Study summary · General aging biology & healthspan

What is the effect of percussive massage treatment (PMT) on recovery from delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) in physically active young men, compared to static stretching and shorter duration PMT?

In one paragraph

Percussive Massage Gun, a randomized controlled trial (Front Public Health 2025, PMID 40206177) — at 48 hours post-intervention (P4), the L-PMT group showed significantly greater jump height, peak ground reaction force, and propulsion impulse during CMJ compared to both SS and S-PMT groups. The abstract for Percussive Massage Gun states no limitations.

Source: Front Public Health 2025, PMID 40206177 ↗ · Research map · How Magellan grades evidence · evidence confidence: medium

Front Public Health · 2025 · PMID 40206177 · DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1561970

Plain-English summary written and published by Magellan Longevity · medical review by Gabriel Radu, DO (physiatrist, NPI 1376861765). We summarize what the paper reported — we did not run this study.

The takeaway

Longer duration percussive massage therapy (40 minutes) is more effective than static stretching or shorter duration percussive massage (25 minutes) for recovering from delayed onset muscle soreness.

The question

What is the effect of percussive massage treatment (PMT) on recovery from delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) in physically active young men, compared to static stretching and shorter duration PMT?

What they tested

The study implicitly hypothesizes that PMT, particularly longer durations, will be more effective than static stretching for DOMS recovery.

How they did it

Thirty physically active male college students were randomized into three groups: static stretching (SS), short-duration PMT (S-PMT, 25 min), and long-duration PMT (L-PMT, 40 min). DOMS was induced via squats. Measurements of pain (VAS), knee joint range of motion (ROM), countermovement jump (CMJ), and integrated electromyography (iEMG) were taken at baseline, post-DOMS, post-intervention, 24h post-intervention, and 48h post-intervention.

What they found

At 48 hours post-intervention (P4), the L-PMT group showed significantly greater jump height, peak ground reaction force, and propulsion impulse during CMJ compared to both SS and S-PMT groups. Normalized iEMGs of three muscles in the L-PMT group were significantly lower than in both S-PMT and SS groups at P4. The L-PMT group also had significantly lower VAS scores and greater knee joint ROM than the SS group at P4.

Effect Size (Cohen's d) of L-PMT vs. Other Groups at 48h Post-Intervention (P4)
Values shown: Cohen's d
Jump Height (L-PMT vs SS)8.691
Jump Height (L-PMT vs S-PMT)4.37
Peak Ground Reaction Force (L-PMT vs SS)19.174
Peak Ground Reaction Force (L-PMT vs S-PMT)14.334
Propulsion Impulse (L-PMT vs SS)8.302
Propulsion Impulse (L-PMT vs S-PMT)4.517
iEMG VM (L-PMT vs S-PMT)-5.692
iEMG RF (L-PMT vs S-PMT)-8.222
iEMG VL (L-PMT vs S-PMT)-10
iEMG VM (L-PMT vs SS)-12
iEMG RF (L-PMT vs SS)-11.384
iEMG VL (L-PMT vs SS)-15
VAS Score (L-PMT vs SS)-1.53
Knee ROM (L-PMT vs SS)4.77

Cohen's d values illustrating the effect sizes of the long-duration PMT group compared to static stretching and short-duration PMT groups for various recovery metrics at 48 hours post-intervention. Positive values indicate L-PMT was better, negative values indicate L-PMT had lower iEMG or VAS scores.

What it means

Percussive massage treatment (PMT) is more effective than static stretching for DOMS recovery. Specifically, two 40-minute PMT sessions provided greater benefits than two 25-minute sessions for treating DOMS.

Limitations

The abstract does not explicitly state any limitations of the study.

Where the published abstract does not list limitations, we say so rather than inventing them. Read the full paper on PubMed before drawing conclusions.

“percussion massage therapy was more effective than static stretching for muscle soreness recovery”— from the published abstract, Front Public Health 2025

The paper at a glance

TitleEffect of percussion massage therapy on recovery of delayed onset muscle soreness: a randomized controlled trial
JournalFront Public Health
Year2025
PMID40206177 ↗
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2025.1561970 ↗
TopicGeneral aging biology & healthspan

Read the source: PubMed record (authors, abstract, full citation) ↗ · Publisher via doi.org ↗

Where Magellan uses this paper

This citation sits behind the evidence grade on the pages below. Grades are set from the research and are independent of affiliate commissions.

Percussive Massage Gun

Systematic reviews of controlled trials indicate that percussive massage acutely increases joint range of motion and flexibility without reducing strength, and randomized trials report less muscle stiffness and soreness and faster recovery after fatiguing exercise.

Percussive Massage Gun

A percussive massage gun (a percussive- or vibration-therapy device) is a handheld motorized tool that…

Check price on Amazon ↗

Research describes the compound or intervention studied. It is not a claim about any specific product.

Cite this page

These citations point at this summary. To cite the original paper with its full author list, use the PubMed record or doi.org.

APA
Magellan Longevity. (2026). What is the effect of percussive massage treatment (PMT) on recovery from delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) in physically active young men, compared to static stretching and shorter duration PMT? [Plain-English summary of Front Public Health 2025, PMID 40206177, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1561970]. Magellan Longevity. https://magellanlongevity.com/study/d40206177.html
BibTeX
@misc{magellan_d40206177, title = {What is the effect of percussive massage treatment (PMT) on recovery from delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) in physically active young men, compared to static stretching and shorter duration PMT?}, author = {{Magellan Longevity}}, year = {2026}, howpublished = {\url{https://magellanlongevity.com/study/d40206177.html}}, note = {Plain-English summary of PubMed PMID 40206177; DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1561970; Front Public Health 2025. Reviewed by Gabriel Radu, DO}, urldate = {2026-08-11} }
Permalink
https://magellanlongevity.com/study/d40206177.html

Related studies in the Magellan library

All 25 Magellan summaries on general aging biology & healthspan →

How this summary was made. Every section above restates what the published abstract of PMID 40206177 reports — the question, the design, the numbers, the authors’ own conclusion and their stated limitations. We do not add claims the paper did not make, and we keep negative and no-effect findings in. Magellan’s evidence grades are set from research like this and never from affiliate commissions.

Prefer the interactive version? Open this summary in the Magellan app → · Browse all 314 study summaries →

Educational information, not medical advice. This is a plain-English summary of published research; it is not a treatment recommendation and nothing here is intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Individual studies can be wrong, and a single paper rarely settles a question. Talk to your physician before acting on any research, especially if you are pregnant, nursing, or taking medication.